Below are my twitter posts since my last post on April 17 of recent cases that I think you’ll find of interest. RSS Feeds are also available:
- BK NEB: dismissal of small business case not required simply bec 1st plan filed not confirmed within 45 days of filing. http://ow.ly/4GVeJ
- BK-TX Houser J reviews 5th Cir principles of post-conf jurisdiction, incl. the case ag. pendant & ancillary jurisdiction. http://ow.ly/4GVoz
- BK-ND-IL-Squires, J. issues long opinion on indiv. ch 11 plan conf. reqts, incl. vitality of abs. pr. rule post-BAPCPA. http://ow.ly/4GV7D
- BK-IL Squires, J’s detailed companion opinion on confirmation requirements for ch.11 indiv.’s ch. 11 debtor corporation. http://ow.ly/4GVUs
- Dist. DC: Under FRCP 502 "intentional-waiver" language, PBGC waived work-product privilege by giving rpt. to Pilots Assn. http://ow.ly/4GVD0
- BK-WI: "no discharge" ch 13 debtor per §1328(f)(1) can "strip-off" wholly unsecured junior lien on principal residence. http://ow.ly/4GVMS
- ND-CA dismisses United Com Bk ch 7 trustee’s constr fraud tsf claims ag FDIC & sustains actual fraudulent intent claims. http://ow.ly/4GW4W
- DCT-PR: Ok to assume an unexpired lease per Ct. Order and then change position and reject lease at plan confirmation. http://ow.ly/4GWg2
- BK-D-CT: Liq Trustee’s Funding Agr. w/ 3d party for > 80% of litigation proceeds isn’t champterous or ag. public policy. http://ow.ly/4GWnB
- BK-ND-IL:No §105(a) inj. ag. condo assn from enforcing lien for fees that would have priority over Debtor’s lien on prop. http://ow.ly/4IuWh
- 10th Cir:§363(m) bars sale invalidation, but appeal not moot if remedy (like constr. trust) doesnt affect sale validity. http://ow.ly/4Iv1l
- BK-DE: Indenture Trustee not entitled to full & immediate payment on account of Make-Whole Premium out of sale proceeds. http://ow.ly/4Iv5r
- ED-MI: 523 cplt untimely under FRBP 4007(c) bec stip between debtor & trustee extending bar date doesnt apply to all crs. http://ow.ly/4Iv9k
- BK-MD-FL: Vendor of routine mgmt svcs a good faith tsfee & "far cry" from bank or law firm reg. dealing w/ insolv issues.http://ow.ly/4IvbP
- BK-ID: plan payments of above-median-income ch 13 debtor w/ no proj dispos income need not continue for set time period. http://ow.ly/4Ivfs
- D.DC.: Truism 1-"No opponent is ever as dedicated or persistent a foe as one that feels aggrieved by its former lawyers." http://ow.ly/4Ivki
- D.DC.: Truism 2-"Effect of agr. to reimburse attys for litig. re their fees will be to incentivize litig. re their fees." http://ow.ly/4Ivki
- BK-SDNY: KEIP and KERP plans approved in Borders as nec. to retain non-insiders and to incentivize mgmt to achieve goals. http://ow.ly/4J7Pk
- SDNY: Refco sec. pltfs survive dismissal on "in pari delicto" & "Wagoner" grounds–"pltfs adeq pled adv. int. exception." http://ow.ly/4KxM4
- SDNY: BK CT has "related to" jd to enjoin non-debtor litig. if bk estate has indemn. or contrib. oblig. to losing party.http://ow.ly/4Ky4b
- BK-HI: Rt. to recover fraudulent tsf from > 4 yrs pre-BK filing depends on when last creditor shd have discovered fraud. http://ow.ly/4Ky8u
- BK-TX: If indenture requires demand on guarantor & no demand made when invol. pet. filed ag. guar., debt is contingent. http://ow.ly/4KydH
- WD-LA approves BK Ct’s analysis & rejection of per se disqualif. of dbtr’s counsel whose retainer/fees paid by creditor. http://ow.ly/4Kyg9
- BK-CA: Licensee can’t "lie in wait" but must litigate whether patents at issue were "Improvements" prior to confirmation. http://ow.ly/4KykP
Thanks for following!
© Steve Jakubowski 2011